12 research-backed prompts that turn ChatGPT, Claude, or any AI tool into the lesson planning partner you actually deserve. Built for classroom teachers, music educators, and anyone who designs instruction.
No subscription. No tech setup. Works with any free AI tool.
You typed something like "create a lesson plan on fractions for a Grade 4 class" or "write a music lesson on improvisation for an intermediate student" and got back a wall of text that looked educational but would fall apart in a real classroom in about four minutes. No hook that gave students a reason to care. No connection to what they already know. No real options for the student who freezes up or the one who is ready to fly. Just a list of steps that sound professional but have no actual structure behind them.
That is not a lesson plan. That is a content dump in lesson plan clothing.
The problem is not AI. The problem is that nobody taught AI how to teach. When you give it a vague prompt, it produces the most average, surface-level output possible. It has no idea what Merrill's First Principles are, what Bloom's Taxonomy actually requires, or what it means to design for a room full of students who all learn differently. So it gives you something generic that technically answers your question and practically helps you with nothing.
These prompts fix that. They tell the AI exactly how learning works before it writes a single word. The result is a plan built around your students, your subject, and your goals. Not a template with names filled in.
These prompts do not just ask AI to write a lesson. They tell the AI exactly how to think about learning. And they ask about your students before they write a word about your lesson.
Copy the prompt that matches your task. 12 options across three tiers: building new lessons, differentiating for diverse learners, and designing assessments that actually work.
Choose your scaffolding mode. Guided builds explicit instruction with heavy teacher modeling and frequent checks for understanding. Standard builds balanced, graduated practice. Expert builds for high student autonomy and transfer-level tasks. This controls how much the lesson scaffolds your students, not the format of the output.
Answer the questions it asks you about your students, your topic, and your context. The prompt waits for your answers before generating anything. Then it builds around you, not around a hypothetical average learner.
Three Tiers • 12 Prompts
Four frameworks from teacher education are woven into every prompt's architecture. You never have to think about them. The prompts think about them for you.
Every effective lesson, regardless of subject, builds around a real problem and moves through activation, demonstration, application, and integration. Every Tier 1 prompt uses this structure automatically. When a phase is missing from a lesson, learning suffers measurably. These prompts do not let phases get skipped.
Not all learning is equal. Memorizing a fact is cognitively different from applying it. Every section in every plan is tagged with its Bloom's level, and every prompt includes an alignment check to confirm your instruction and assessment are aimed at the same cognitive target.
Every learner is different. UDL builds multiple ways in and multiple ways to show learning into the design from the start, not as an afterthought for students who struggle. The four Tier 2 prompts are dedicated entirely to UDL access design. Every Tier 1 prompt includes access options automatically.
Students learn when three needs are met: genuine choice, manageable challenge with specific feedback, and connection to something they care about. Every prompt ends with a motivation check confirming all three are present. If any is missing, the prompt flags it and suggests a fix.
I built these prompts because I got tired of getting garbage from AI and assuming that was as good as it gets. I use these in my own studio, in my classes at Keyin College, and at Memorial University. They are tested, refined, and built around the real constraints of real teaching schedules.
Classroom teachers, music educators, adult instructors, college faculty. The instructional design framework behind these prompts works for any subject at any level. The questions they ask adapt to whatever context you bring. I built them in a music studio and a college classroom. Teachers in other subjects use them just as effectively.
Here is what happens when you ask AI for a lesson plan versus when you give it a structured prompt that knows how learning works. This example is from a music studio, and the same gap shows up in every classroom and every subject.
The difference is not the AI. It is how you talk to it.
That math runs from a conservative estimate. Teachers who write thoughtful, differentiated lesson plans from scratch spend considerably more. Add in the time to design a choice board, write a rubric, and build in access options and you are looking at an hour or more per week.
These prompts do not replace your expertise. They compress the time it takes to apply it. You still bring the student knowledge, the subject depth, and the professional judgment. What the prompts do is structure all of that into a plan in under a minute instead of from scratch in half an hour.
I am Brad Jefford. I run a private guitar studio in St. John's, Newfoundland, instruct applied AI at Keyin College, and teach guitar methods at Memorial University. I have been teaching in some form for over 20 years across private lessons, post-secondary classrooms, and adult professional development.
I built this library because I got tired of watching talented teachers in music studios, in college classrooms, in every subject get flat, generic output from AI and assume that was as good as it gets. It is not even close. The problem was never the tool. The problem was that nobody had built the pedagogical knowledge into the prompt itself.
I spent months testing and refining these prompts across different subjects, different levels, and different AI tools. What I ended up with is a library that applies the same instructional design frameworks I learned in my M.Mus program at Memorial University, condensed into prompts any teacher can use in under a minute without needing to know the theory behind them.
These are the prompts I use in my own teaching. Not a consultant building tools for teachers from the outside. A working teacher who figured out how to make AI actually useful in the classroom, and wants every other teacher to have the same thing.
Teachers are exhausted by recurring charges. Pay once, use these forever. The prompts do not expire and do not require any platform account.
No credit card. No signup. Instant download.
CAD • One-time purchase • Instant access